Harbeson v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding ‘‘no difficulty’’ in discerning from record that ‘‘trial court imposed a more severe sentence on the defendant solely because he asserted his right to a judi- cial ruling on his motion to suppress’’
• case presented rare exception to general rule of unreviewability of claims following plea of nolo contendere
• trial court violated defendant’s due process rights by adding a year to defendant’s sentence for the stated reason that defendant pursued a motion to suppress before entering plea

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).