Harbel Oil Co. v. Superior Court of Maricopa County

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the determination of whether the trial court had authority to consider certain issues on remand would require analysis of the holding and terms of the mandate previously issued
• resolving whether trial court violated the mandate required analysis of the appellate court’s decision
• where the appellate court “neither expressly nor impliedly” addressed certain defenses, the trial court could address the defenses on remand because they were not inconsistent with mandate’s holding
• on remand trial court retains jurisdiction over unconsidered defenses

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).