Harapat v. Harris

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that protective orders “should be sparingly used and cautiously granted”
• There, the court also found that “the brief and conclusory doctor’s certificate is not sufficient to obtain a blanket ninety-day protective order against her deposition”
• granting plaintiff a temporary protective order only

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).