· 5/15/1882
Harang v. Blanc
Citations
- 34 La. 638
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding reliance element was not met where defendant relied on its own 2 business judgment in developing and commercializing accused product
- asserting that “the public interest nearly always weighs in favor of protecting property rights”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tone
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.