Skip to main content
· 5/15/1882

Harang v. Blanc

Citations

  • 34 La. 638

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding reliance element was not met where defendant relied on its own 2 business judgment in developing and commercializing accused product
  • asserting that “the public interest nearly always weighs in favor of protecting property rights”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tone

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.