Harada v. Burns

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that interpretations of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure are \highly persuasive\
• relying on Beacon Theatres to conclude that mortgagors were entitled to jury determination of legal issues raised by counterclaim interposed in equity suit even though counterclaim was permissive
• federal courts' interpretations of the FRCP are deemed \highly persuasive in the reasoning of this court\ since the HRCP were patterned after the federal rules
• federal courts’ interpretations of the FRCP are deemed “highly persuasive in, the reasoning of this court” since the HRCP were patterned after the federal rules
• “The seventh amendment jury trial requirement is not binding upon the states.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).