Skip to main content
· 10/6/1998

Hapner v. State

Citations

  • 699 N.E.2d 1200
  • 1998 WL 687386

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that State and general contractor’s acceptance of subcontractor’s work was established as matter of law; subcontractor completed work it was asked to do and construction project continued on without it’s participation
  • observing that subcontractor had no participation or presence on the construction site for the ten months between completion of its work and the automobile accident

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kirsch, Staton, Robb

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.