Skip to main content
· 12/28/1999

Hanumadass v. Coffield, Ungaretti & Harris

Citations

  • 724 N.E.2d 14
  • 311 Ill. App. 3d 94
  • 243 Ill. Dec. 705
  • 1999 Ill. App. LEXIS 927

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a lawyer-client relationship does not give rise to a duty to protect the client’s emotional well-being
  • “[I]ncluded within the rubric of legal malpractice are claims grounded in breach of contract, negligence, and breach of fiduciary duty.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cousins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.