Skip to main content
· 1/7/1974

Hanson v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Industries, Inc.

Citations

  • 414 U.S. 1136
  • 94 S. Ct. 880

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that Amos and Brooks took 20 minutes to return a verdict after the renewed deliberations
  • “[t]he purpose of a jury poll is to test the uncoerced unanimity of the verdict by requiring each juror to answer for himself, thus creating individual responsibility, eliminating any uncertainty as to the verdict announced by the foreman” [internal quotation marks omitted]

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Certiorari

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.