Skip to main content
· 2/12/1916

Hanson v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.

Citations

  • 97 Kan. 218
  • 154 P. 1033
  • 1916 Kan. LEXIS 266

Syllabus

<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>Motion for Continuance — Absent Evidence — No Diligence Shown. Where a plaintiff moves for a continuance on the ground that on account of his poverty he has not been able to look up the evidence and find witnesses to prove his ease, a denial of the motion is justified by evidence that he had brought a previous action on the same cause, which he had dismissed when it whs brought to trial, suing again just before the expiration of a year.</p>

Judges: Mason

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.