Skip to main content
· 9/14/2011

Hanson v. Caterpillar, Inc.

Citations

  • 837 F. Supp. 2d 899
  • 25 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 919
  • 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 103904
  • 2011 WL 4337014

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • striking portions of the Complaint that were immaterial and irrelevant to the claims and served no purpose except to inflame the reader
  • striking as “immaterial and irrelevant” a defendant employer’s “alleged mistreatment of customers” in a wage-and-hour case not brought on behalf of any customer
  • denying severance without prejudice given “uncertainty as to Defendants, third party wit- nesses and documents at this time”
  • denying severance without prejudice given “uncertainty as to Defendants, third party wit- nesses and documents at this time”
  • denying motion to sever “without prejudice to renewal or to a further motion to sever and transfer”
  • striking allegations when they served “no purpose except to inflame the reader’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Zagel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.