Appellate Court of Illinois· 5/27/2008
Hanson v. Ahmed
Citations
- 382 Ill. App. 3d 941
- 889 N.E.2d 740
- 321 Ill. Dec. 475
- 2008 Ill. App. LEXIS 478
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- providing that discovery depositions may be used “for any purpose for which an affidavit may be used”
- providing that discovery depositions may be used \for any purpose for which an affidavit may be used\
- “[T]he reach of the long-arm statute may lie within or may touch, but cannot extend beyond, the bounds circumscribed by the requirements of due process.”
- participation in two phone calls initiated by an Illinois claims adjuster were “extremely attenuated” contacts with Illinois and so did not constitute minimum contacts with Illinois sufficient to establish personal jurisdiction and satisfy due process
- a phone call initiated by another party is not sufficient contact
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hoffman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.