Hanson PLC v. National Union Fire Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that trial court did not err in instructing jury that \result directly\ language in fidelity bond may be defined as proximate cause
• stating that trial court did not err in instructing jury that “result directly” language in fidelity bond may be defined as proximate cause
• explaining “[a] secret intent is of no consequence” because manifest intent must be apparent or obvious
• manifest intent exists when a particular result is “substantially certain” to follow from conduct
• manifest intent exists when a particular result is \substantially certain\ to follow from conduct
• manifest intent exists when a particular result is \substantially certain\ to follow from conduct

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).