Skip to main content
· 8/21/1996

Hansman v. State

Citations

  • 679 So. 2d 1216
  • 1996 WL 471166

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reiterating that once the defendant has offered any evidence to show consent, the State must disprove consent beyond a reasonable doubt
  • stating defendant has the burden of initially offering evidence to establish the affirmative defense, after which the burden shifts to the state to disprove the defense beyond a reasonable doubt
  • testimony in theft case that the defendant was given permission to take the owner’s baseball card .collection so that he could file fraudulent insurance claim was erroneously excluded as it went to the defense of the case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Farmer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.