Hansford v. Maplewood Station Business Park

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that T.R.8(D) applied where the opposing party failed to file any response to Hansford's counterclaim and, thus, the trial court erred in allowing the opposing party to enter a general denial at trial
• explaining that “unless the evidence viewed in a light most favorable to the trial court leads uncontrovertibly to a conclusion opposite to the one reached, we will not reverse the determination of the trial court”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).