Hansen v. Sioux By-Products

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an employee’s conduct is protected if it alerts the employer to the employee’s desire for workers’ compensation for a work-related injury
• Holding that “where the court has dismissed ... the federal claim or claims upon which removal was premised, the statute governing the court’s jurisdiction over remaining state-law claims is 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c) rather than 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c
• retaining jurisdiction where trial was three months away and it was uncertain whether the state court could accommodate trial in the same time frame
• retaining jurisdiction where trial was three months away and it was uncertain whether the state court could accommodate trial in the same time frame
• termination the same day that the plaintiff was injured at work and reported the injury satisfied the requirements of the prima facie case
• where plaintiff conceded summary judgment on the federal claim eleven months after removal, court found the resources invested in pre-trial administration justified retaining jurisdiction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).