Hansen v. Sentry Insurance Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the “parties, quite rightly, do not dispute that the substantive law of New Hampshire applies to the coverage issues in this diversity case”
• noting that the “parties, quite rightly, do not dispute that the substantive law of New Hampshire applies to the coverage issues in this diversity case”
• finding that a fiduciary relationship existed where the defendant “had access to confidential information . . . along with knowledge of [his employer’s] current and potential customers, and its marketing strategies”
• finding that a fiduciary relationship existed where the defendant “had access to confidential information . . . along with knowledge of [his employer’s] current and potential customers, and its marketing strategies”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).