Hansen v. Bussman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “A meaningful exercise of that responsibility [to protect the best interests of the minor child] requires the probate court to make its determination on the basis of circumstances at the time approval is sought.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Shelton Ex Rel. Heider v. Sloan
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1999-02-15· cited 21×
• Hansen v. Bussman
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1979-10-23· cited 6×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Hekker v. Sabre Construction Company
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1973-05-24· cited 47×
• Hansen v. Bussman
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1976-04-29· cited 35×
• EVENSON MASONRY INCORPORATED v. Eldred
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1975-12-18· cited 19×