Skip to main content
· 2/23/1989

Hansen v. Barmore

Citations

  • 779 P.2d 1360
  • 13 Brief Times Rptr. 205
  • 1989 Colo. App. LEXIS 56
  • 1989 WL 15714

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • no violation of cooperation clause where “record [wa]s devoid of a single example of a request by [insurer] for assistance from [insured] which was refused”
  • proper notice given when plaintiff mailed copy of served complaint to defendant’s insurance company
  • “Generally, the question of whether the insured has violated his insurance policy by failing to cooperate with the insurer is a question of fact for the trial court.”
  • “Generally, the question of whether the insured has violated his insurance policy by failing to cooperate with the insurer is a question of fact for the trial court.”
  • “Generally, the question of whether the insured has violated his insurance policy by failing to cooperate with the insurer is a question of fact for the trial court.”
  • “Generally, the question of whether the insured has violated his insurance policy by failing to cooperate with the insurer is a question of fact for the trial court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fischbach, Sternberg, Ney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.