· 2/23/1989
Hansen v. Barmore
Citations
- 779 P.2d 1360
- 13 Brief Times Rptr. 205
- 1989 Colo. App. LEXIS 56
- 1989 WL 15714
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- no violation of cooperation clause where “record [wa]s devoid of a single example of a request by [insurer] for assistance from [insured] which was refused”
- proper notice given when plaintiff mailed copy of served complaint to defendant’s insurance company
- “Generally, the question of whether the insured has violated his insurance policy by failing to cooperate with the insurer is a question of fact for the trial court.”
- “Generally, the question of whether the insured has violated his insurance policy by failing to cooperate with the insurer is a question of fact for the trial court.”
- “Generally, the question of whether the insured has violated his insurance policy by failing to cooperate with the insurer is a question of fact for the trial court.”
- “Generally, the question of whether the insured has violated his insurance policy by failing to cooperate with the insurer is a question of fact for the trial court.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fischbach, Sternberg, Ney
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.