Skip to main content
· 11/13/1909

Hansen & Dieckmann v. United States

Citations

  • 175 F. 892
  • 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5775

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding intervenors' separate action alleging that a consent decree should be set aside due to fraud as not actionable because the court continued to maintain jurisdiction over the consent decree

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Platt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.