Hanover Insurance Group v. Mezansky

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding the contents of a letter were not defamatory per se because criticizing a public agency and its procedures were “not an attack directed solely at plaintiff,” and “did not address the [ability of plaintiff] to practice his profession” (alteration in original) (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).