Supreme Court· 11/23/1926
Hanover Fire Insurance v. Harding
Citations
- 272 U.S. 494
- 47 S. Ct. 179
- 71 L. Ed. 372
- 1926 U.S. LEXIS 17
- 49 A.L.R. 713
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- court must regard substance not form for determining whether tax constitutional, and test is \in the operation and effect of the law as applied and enforced by the state\ (quoting St. Louis S.W. Ry. Co. v. Arkansas , 235 U.S. 350, 362 (1914))
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Taft
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
103 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Allied Stores of Ohio, Inc. v. BowersSupreme Court· 1959-02-24· cited 747×
- Oregon v. MitchellSupreme Court· 1970-12-21· cited 575×
- Western & Southern Life Ins. Co. v. State Bd. of Equalization of Cal.Supreme Court· 1981-05-26· cited 575×
- James v. Dravo Contracting Co.Supreme Court· 1937-12-06· cited 542×
- Great Northern Life Insurance Co. v. ReadSupreme Court· 1944-04-24· cited 463×
- Prudential Insurance v. BenjaminSupreme Court· 1946-06-03· cited 408×
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. WardSupreme Court· 1985-05-20· cited 343×
- Metropolitan Casualty Ins. Co. v. BrownellSupreme Court· 1935-03-18· cited 241×
- Power Manufacturing Co. v. SaundersSupreme Court· 1927-05-31· cited 235×
- Watson v. Employers Liability Assurance Corp.Supreme Court· 1955-01-10· cited 229×
- O'Gorman & Young, Inc. v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co.Supreme Court· 1931-01-05· cited 202×
- Louis K. Liggett Co. v. LeeSupreme Court· 1933-03-13· cited 195×
- Quaker City Cab Co. v. Commonwealth of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court· 1928-05-28· cited 192×
- Foster-Fountain Packing Co. v. HaydelSupreme Court· 1928-10-15· cited 180×
- Nelson v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court· 1941-03-17· cited 166×
- Gregg Dyeing Co. v. QuerySupreme Court· 1932-05-31· cited 159×
- Bailey v. RichardsonD.C. Circuit· 1950-06-05· cited 154×
- Connecticut General Life Insurance v. JohnsonSupreme Court· 1938-01-31· cited 153×
- Reif v. BarrettIllinois Supreme Court· 1933-12-22· cited 137×
- Wheeling Steel Corp. v. GlanderSupreme Court· 1949-06-20· cited 126×
Cites
31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Paul v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1869-11-18· cited 857×
- Truax v. CorriganSupreme Court· 1921-12-19· cited 592×
- Sioux City Bridge Co. v. Dakota CountySupreme Court· 1923-01-02· cited 498×
- Frost & Frost Trucking Co. v. Railroad Comm'n of Cal.Supreme Court· 1926-06-07· cited 441×
- Sunday Lake Iron Co. v. Township of WakefieldSupreme Court· 1918-06-03· cited 408×
- Bailey v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1911-01-03· cited 354×
- Greene v. Louisville & Interurban RailroadSupreme Court· 1917-06-11· cited 311×
- Cummings v. National BankSupreme Court· 1880-03-18· cited 272×
- Sioux Remedy Co. v. CopeSupreme Court· 1914-11-30· cited 170×
- Terral v. Burke Construction Co.Supreme Court· 1922-02-27· cited 158×
- Air-Way Electric Appliance Corp. v. DaySupreme Court· 1924-10-20· cited 145×
- Looney, Attorney General of Texas v. Crane CoSupreme Court· 1916-05-03· cited 122×
- Cheney Bros. Co. v. Commonwealth of MassachusettsSupreme Court· 1916-04-20· cited 122×
- Appleby v. City of New YorkSupreme Court· 1926-06-01· cited 115×
- Horn Silver Mining Co. v. New York StateSupreme Court· 1892-02-29· cited 113×
- Taylor v. Louisville & N. R.Sixth Circuit· 1898-07-05· cited 103×
- St. Louis Cotton Compress Co. v. ArkansasSupreme Court· 1922-12-04· cited 92×
- Ducat v. ChicagoSupreme Court· 1871-01-18· cited 85×
- Kansas City, Memphis & Birmingham Railroad v. StilesSupreme Court· 1916-12-04· cited 71×
- Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Md. v. TafoyaSupreme Court· 1926-03-22· cited 62×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.