Hanntz v. Shiley, Inc. a Div. of Pfizer, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• cautioning that “the policies of Rule 4.2 do not justify a wholesale restriction on discovery of factual information, damaging or not”
• rule “prevents a represented party from being overwhelmed by opposing counsel”
• “Because RPC 4.2 refers only to represented parties and because the purposes of RPC 4.2 would not be served by an interpretation otherwise, it cannot be said that RPC 4.2 applies to former employees who are not parties.”
• describing reference by Chancellor to former employees as “dicta”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).