Hannia María Associates S.E. v. Triple-S Propiedad, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting claim that article on auto-erotic asphyxiation incited imminent lawless action and raising the question of whether written materials could ever create culpable imminent incitement under Brandenburg
• refusing to impose civil liability against Hustler for “inciting” accidental asphyxiation, observing that “[m]ere negligence . . . cannot form the basis of liability under the incitement doctrine”
• “The crucial element to lowering the first amendment shield is the imminence of the threatened evil.”
• “The crucial element to lowering the [F]irst [A]mendment shield is the imminence of the threatened evil.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).