Hannan v. Hartford Financial Services, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying, on a Rule 59(e) motion, the doctrine of reverse confusion when reviewing a jury verdict finding a likelihood of confusion
• evaluating reverse confusion claim using same factors as in forward confusion claim
• “Leave to file a surreply may be granted when the movant otherwise would be unable to contest matters presented for the first time in the opposing party’s reply.”
• mark that “combines two words to create something that sounds like an English word, but is spelled differently” and “conjures” favorable images of the product/service is suggestive, not fanciful
• Americana Hotels and Americana Motels

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).