Hanna Mining Co. v. State Tax Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over ADA and Rehabilitation Act claims as plaintiff did not exhaust administrative remedies
• stating that claims for declaratory and injunctive relief and attorneys’ fees “appeared] to be available under the IDEA”
• explaining that “administrative system is uniquely well suited to review the content and implementation of IEPs”
• cautioning that claims of failure to implement must be “closely examine[d]” lest the “futility exception ... swallow the exhaustion requirement”
• suggesting that administrative exhaustion is futile where a “school has failed to implement services that were specified or otherwise clearly stated in an IEP”
• stating that the IDEA was intended to remedy a claim where the plaintiff sought relief for a school district’s alleged failure to provide her with appropriate educational services

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).