Hanna Mining Co. v. Minnesota Power and Light Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• parents and subsidiary were indispensable parties where both had identical interests in subject of action, citing Reserve Mining Co. v. EPA, 514 F.2d 492, 534 (8th Cir. 1975)
• where company was created to hold and operate parent's interest in Minnesota mining project, principal place of business was Minnesota rather than state where executive and administrative offices were located
• agent owned 37.5% of its principal’s stock

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).