Skip to main content
· 12/5/1985

Hanlin v. Mitchelson

Citations

  • 623 F. Supp. 452
  • 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13144

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that a client’s misrepresentation of important facts should be considered as part of the malpractice claim, and dismissing case, in part due to the client’s misrepresentation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Leisure

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.