Hanlin Group, Inc. v. International Minerals & Chemical Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying nuisance law to a claim “between vendor and vendee” following the purchase of certain factories
• Trespass action by the subsequent owner against the prior owner of the property, and the court held that trespass would not lie because the intruding chemicals were placed on the property during the defendant’s lawful occupation
• following T & E Industries in case applying Maine law
• private nuisance action cannot be brought because doctrine does not apply to successive landowners; public nuisance claim is dismissed because impairment of value of plaintiff’s property is not a special injury in the exercise of right common to the general public

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).