Hanley v. Donoghue
Citations
- 116 U.S. 1
- 6 S. Ct. 242
- 29 L. Ed. 535
- 1885 U.S. LEXIS 1882
Syllabus
<p>Under art. 4, seo. 1, of the Constitution, and § 905 of the Revised Statutes, a judgment recovered in one State against two joint defendants, one of whom, has been duly summoned and the other has not, and which is valid and enforceable by the law of that State against the former alone, will support-an action against him in another State.</p> <p>This court, upon writ of error to the highest court of a State, does not take judicial notice of the law of another State, not proved in that court and made part of the record serit up, unless by the local law that court takes judicial notice of it.</p> <p>In an action brought in one State upon a judgment recovered against the defendant jointly with another person imánother State, an averment that'the judgment, by the law of the State in which it was rendered, is valid and enforceable against this defendant and void against the other person is an allegation of fact, which is admitted by demurrer.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- law is known to the Court as law alone, needing no averment or proof
- Congress, in enacting 11 U.S.C. § 362(a
- “‘Congress, in enacting 11 U.S.C. § 362(a
- “‘Congress, in enacting 11 U.S.C. § 362(a
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gray
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
123 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Mills v. GreenSupreme Court· 1895-11-25· cited 1,019×
- Huntington v. AttrillSupreme Court· 1892-12-12· cited 815×
- Milwaukee County v. M. E. White Co.Supreme Court· 1935-12-09· cited 351×
- Griffin v. GriffinSupreme Court· 1946-04-29· cited 294×
- Adam v. SaengerSupreme Court· 1938-01-31· cited 293×
- Old Dominion Copper Mining & Smelting Co. v. BigelowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1909-09-14· cited 235×
- Riley v. New York Trust Co.Supreme Court· 1942-03-16· cited 182×
- Simmons v. SaulSupreme Court· 1891-03-02· cited 140×
- Thomas v. Board of Trustees of the Ohio State UniversitySupreme Court· 1904-11-14· cited 140×
- Tilt v. KelseySupreme Court· 1907-10-21· cited 123×
- Abie State Bank v. BryanSupreme Court· 1931-02-25· cited 114×
- Gallup v. CaldwellThird Circuit· 1941-05-21· cited 108×
- Parkway Baking Co. v. Freihofer Baking Co.Third Circuit· 1958-05-21· cited 108×
- Western Life Indemnity Co. of Ill. v. RuppSupreme Court· 1914-11-30· cited 72×
- Hooper v. GoldsteinSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1968-05-08· cited 70×
- Bothwell v. Buckbee-Mears CoSupreme Court· 1927-01-05· cited 62×
- Shapleigh v. MierSupreme Court· 1937-01-04· cited 58×
- State ex rel. Taggart v. HolcombSupreme Court of Kansas· 1911-06-10· cited 51×
- Gasquet v. LapeyreSupreme Court· 1917-01-08· cited 50×
- United States v. Frank GervatoThird Circuit· 1973-01-26· cited 49×
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Christmas v. RussellSupreme Court· 1866-12-26· cited 187×
- Lámar v. MicouSupreme Court· 1885-03-30· cited 165×
- Church v. HubbartSupreme Court· 1804-03-18· cited 115×
- Hall v. LanningSupreme Court· 1875-12-13· cited 85×
- Pennington v. GibsonSupreme Court· 1854-03-18· cited 58×
- Strother v. LucasSupreme Court· 1832-03-15· cited 36×
- Dainese v. HaleSupreme Court· 1875-10-25· cited 27×
- Wright v. AndrewsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1881-01-15· cited 24×
- United States v. TurnerSupreme Court· 1851-02-21· cited 16×
- Thomas S. Hinde and Wife, in Error v. The Lessee of Charles VattierSupreme Court· 1831-01-22· cited 14×
- Sheldon v. HopkinsNew York Supreme Court· 1831-10-15· cited 10×
- Coates v. MackeyCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1881-06-29· cited 9×
- Course v. SteadSupreme Court· 1800-02-18· cited 5×
Other cases named Hanley v. Donoghue
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.