Hankins v. State of Hawaii

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a durational residency requirement for candidacy does not “penalize,'' and thus violate, the potential candidate’s right to travel because the candidate need not choose between exercising different fundamental rights
• upholding Hawaii’s five-year residency requirement as a condition of eligibility for office of governor
• five-year residence re- quirement for Hawaii governor under state constitution
• five-year residence requirement for Hawaii governor under state constitution
• upholding durational requirement for gubernatorial candidacy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).