Supreme Court of Delaware· 7/15/2009
Hankins v. State
Citations
- 976 A.2d 839
- 2009 Del. LEXIS 354
- 2009 WL 2040661
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \[T]his Court will review de novo a refusal to instruct on a defense theory (in any form) ....\ (quoting Wright v. State , 953 A.2d 144 , 148 (Del. 2008) (en banc) )
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Steele, Holland, Ridgely
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2009-11-04· cited 35×
- Cooke v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2014-07-24· cited 23×
- Taylor v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2011-09-12· cited 12×
- Lowther v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2014-11-06· cited 11×
- Wong v. BroughtonSupreme Court of Delaware· 2019-02-04· cited 5×
- Galindez v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2019-10-14
- State v. BowieSuperior Court of Delaware· 2022-09-01
- State v. FordSuperior Court of Delaware· 2023-04-19
- Waller v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2025-04-14
- Ford v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2025-05-01
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2026-05-27
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Flamer v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1984-09-20· cited 149×
- Cabrera v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2000-03-06· cited 45×
- Wright v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2008-02-07· cited 32×
- Burrell v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2008-06-17· cited 21×
- Henry v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2002-09-03· cited 16×
- Miller v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2006-03-09· cited 14×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.