Hankins v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding “the out-of-state offense referred to in section 775.082(9)(a) must be interpreted to require that the elements of the out-of-state offense would be sufficient for a conviction under a Florida statute that is punishable as a felony” (footnote omitted)
• when determining whether out-of-state conviction qualifies pursuant to the PRR statute, court must look at elements of the offense, not the underlying actions or conduct

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Guilford v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-05-18· cited 8×
• Justin Rashad Howard v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-04-30· cited 6×
• Johnson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-04-02· cited 1×
• JAMES E. LONG v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2020-07-22

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Carpenter v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2001-03-01· cited 66×
• Dautel v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1995-07-20· cited 40×
• Knarich v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-02-20· cited 13×
• Plute v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-01-24· cited 10×
• People v. Cornish
  New York Supreme Court· 1980-04-23· cited 9×
• Hollingsworth v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-01-09· cited 5×
• Hankins v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-11-03· cited 4×
• Aldacosta v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-08-18· cited 3×