Hanka v. Pogatchnik

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that if the findings necessary for a legal conclusion are adequately supported, a court’s inclusion of other unsupported findings is harmless error
• stating that where the findings 6 necessary for a legal conclusion are adequately supported, a district court’s inclusion of other unsupported findings is harmless error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).