· 7/25/2013
Hank Willms v. Rowe Sanderson, Iii
Citations
- 723 F.3d 1094
- 2013 WL 3823579
- 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 15187
- 58 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 58
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that we review for clear error the bankruptcy court’s factual findings
- stating that the timely resolution of nondischargeability complaints balances bankruptcy’s competing goals of providing a fresh start for debtors and insuring that “relief intended for honest debtors does not go to dishonest debtors”
- “A § 523 complaint focus[es] on the debtor’s prior dealings with an objecting creditor, rather than on actions which necessarily affect the rights of all creditors”
- “[Section] 105(a) is not a ‘roving commission to do equity.’ A bankruptcy court’s equitable powers ‘must and can only be exercised within the confines of the Bankruptcy Code’” (citations omitted).
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Alarcón, McKeown, Nguyen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.