Hank Purcell, Jr. v. Com. Tom Coughlin, Warden Dominic Montello, Edward Abbott, Dolores Weztherbee, William Reisdorf, Carl Berg and Guard Luczrelli

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that name-calling without “any appreciable injury” did not violate a prisoner’s constitutional rights
• holding that name-calling without “any appreciable injury” did not violate inmate’s constitutional rights
• holding that name-calling without “any appreciable injury” did not violate inmate’s constitutional rights
• holding that officers’ name-calling did not violate an inmate’s rights
• holding that mere name-calling did not violate inmate’s constitutional rights
• affirming a district court finding that prison guards “name calling” an incarcerated plaintiff did not amount to a constitutional violation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).