Hanish v. Westinghouse Broadcasting Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• assuming without elaboration that section 611 of the Restatement, 2d, represents the law of Pennsylvania
• fact that plaintiff attracted press attention in connection with his fundraising activities for charity cannot be equated with the existence of a public controversy
• fact that plaintiff attracted press attention in connection with his fundraising activities for charity cannot be equated with the existence of a public controversy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).