Haney v. Pierce County

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that courts apply state contract law in determining the validity and scope of an arbitration agreement
• stating that “Mastrobuono dictates that general choice-of-law clauses do not incorporate state rules” for arbitration
• noting that issue is unsettled, but favoring the view that \the FAA applies to non-binding arbitration\
• noting that issue is unsettled, but favoring the view that “the FAA applies to non-binding arbitration”
• Noting that “[n]o magic words such as “arbitrate” or “binding arbitration” or “final dispute resolution” are needed to obtain the benefits of [the Federal Arbitration Act]”
• noting that issue is unsettled, but favoring the view that \the FAA applies to non-binding arbitration\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).