Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 3/30/1982

Haney v. Commonwealth

Citations

65 Pa. Commw. 461
442 A.2d 1223
1982 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 1160

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

proper standard is whether, based upon thorough review of entire record, medical testimony, taken as a whole, is sufficiently unequivocal to support finding for claimant
appellate court may affirm the decision of the WCJ if it is supported by the record even if the WCJ failed to apply the correct legal standard in reaching decision
an appellate court will affirm the action below where an administrative agency assigns an erroneous reason to a correct decision and the record clearly shows the correct basis for that decision
where a court makes a correct ruling, order, decision, judgment, or decree but assigns erroneous reasons for its action, appellate court will affirm the action below where the correct basis for the ruling, order, decision, judgment, or decree is clear upon the record

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mencer, Craig, MacPhail, Pat, Adtnq

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

49 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Haney v. Commonwealth

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Haney v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 2016-09-23· cited 8×

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.