Haney v. Blair

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing retaliation claim where “the amended complaint indicate[d] that the [p]laintiff did not put her employer on notice of the alleged racial discrimination”
• finding employer was not put on notice by plaintiff’s complaints “regarding the Defendant’s policies and practices concerning defibrillators that allegedly endangered patients” because such complaints were entirely “race-neutral”
• protected activity includes “protest[ing] or oppos[ing] statutorily prohibited discrimination,” and “must put the employer on notice that the employee feels” that he was discriminated against
• “A section 1981 retaliation claim includes the same substantive elements as a Title VII retaliation claim[.]” (quotation marks and citation omitted)
• “Plaintiff’s bald assertions of discrimination—unsupported by any meaningful comments, actions, or examples of similarly[- ]situated persons outside of the Plaintiff’s protected class being treated differently—are insufficient to survive a motion to dismiss.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).