· 5/10/1999
Haney v. Addison
Citations
- 175 F.3d 1217
- 1999 Colo. J. C.A.R. 2778
- 43 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 763
- 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 8795
- 1999 WL 288295
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Absent both designation by the district court and consent of the parties, a magistrate[ judge]’s recommendation is not a final appealable decision . . . .”
- “Absent both designation by the district court and consent of the parties, a magistrate[ judge]’s recommendation is not a final appealable decision . . . .”
- “Absent both designation by the district court and consent of the parties, a magistrate[ judge]’s recommendation is not a final appealable decision . . . .”
- affirming dismissal with prejudice of untimely 2254 petition
- affirming dismissal with prejudice of untimely 2254 petition
- affirming dismissal with prejudice of untimely 2254 petition
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brorby, Ebel, Lucero
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.