Hanewald v. Board of Liquor Control

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that plaintiff could not establish cruel and unusual punishment where “[h]e was kept in restraints for 24 hours,” he “was checked every two hours by prison officers and every four hours by medical personnel,” and he “offered no medical complaints”
• use of ambulatory restraints for 24 hours did not violate Eighth Amendment
• use of ambulatory restraints for 24 hours did not violate Eighth Amendment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).