Hanes v. State, Use of Lamm

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding a specific res ipsa loquitur instruction unnecessary because it was “inferentially presented” to the jury
• it is for jury to decide whether defendant’s car was forced from road by another vehicle
• res ipsa loquitur properly applied where the vehicle skidded and left road without explanation, there was no evidence of specific acts of negligence, and the road was dry, straight, and slightly uphill at point of the accident
• res ipsa loquitur properly applied where the vehicle skidded and left road without explanation, there was no evidence of specific acts of negligence, and the road was dry, straight, and slightly uphill at point of the accident

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).