Haneman v. Pile
Citations
- 161 Pa. 599
- 29 A. 113
- 1894 Pa. LEXIS 740
Syllabus
<p>Bes adjudicata — Equity—Judgment.</p> <p>Where a party has been heard, or has had the opportunity of being heard in a court of law, even though his claim or defence be an equitable one, he cannot be re-heard on a bill in equity.</p> <p>Where a rule to set aside a judgment, and a sale thereunder, has been discharged, the defendant cannot be heard as to the same matters on a bill in equity.</p> <p>Equity — Pleading—Deed.</p> <p>Where the plaintiff in a bill in equity rests his title upon a deed, he must either annex a copy of the deed to the bill, orrefer to it by place of record.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that insurance fund was not estopped from denying coverage for worker’s compensation claims and stating that “[tjhere being no detrimental reliance, we decline to apply the equitable doctrine of estoppel.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dean, Green, Mitchell, Stekrett, Williams
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.