Handwerk v. Town of Guttenberg

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[Debtor’s] 2009 bankruptcy discharge could not have excused [him] for any infringing activities that he continued post-discharge, 10 including his continuing to leave online any infringing material that he originally posted pre-petition.”
• “‘[D]omain names are assets which a debtor must list on his asset schedules.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).