Handley v. Graham

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that ALJ properly found plaintiff’s testimony about the severity of his ailments to be unsupported by the medical record, and that the ALJ properly relied on the testimony of a vocational expert that plaintiff was not disabled
• noting that ALJ had limited claimant to “occasionally climb[ing] ramps or stairs and stoop; and [] never climb[ing] ladders, ropes, or scaffolds”
• finding substantial evidence supported ALJ’s determination that claimant’s use of a cane was not medically necessary in light of the record and a physician also opining it was not necessary

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).