Skip to main content
· 4/29/1991

Handler v. Hulsey

Citations

  • 406 S.E.2d 225
  • 199 Ga. App. 751
  • 1991 Ga. App. LEXIS 657

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that even a new claim may be asserted on a devo appeal, so long as the new claim relates to the subject of the magistrate court litigation
  • where issues raised in counterclaim were directly related to the issues raised in magistrate court, they were properly considered part of the de novo proceeding and application was required
  • where issues raised in counterclaim were directly related to the issues raised in magistrate court, they were properly considered part of the de novo proceeding, such that application was required
  • “The only avenue of appeal available from the magistrate court judgment is provided by OCGA § 15-10-41 (b) (1), which allows for a de novo appeal to the state or superior court.”
  • “The only avenue of appeal available from [a] magistrate court judgment is provided by OCGA § 15-10-41 (b) (1), which allows for a de novo appeal to the state or superior court.”
  • “The only avenue of appeal available from the magistrate court judgment is provided by OCGA § 15-10-41 (b) (1), which allows for a de novo appeal to the state or superior court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Andrews, Sognier, McMurray

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.