· 10/20/1994
Handelsman v. Sea Insurance
Citations
- 647 N.E.2d 1258
- 85 N.Y.2d 96
- 623 N.Y.S.2d 750
- 1994 N.Y. LEXIS 3371
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Where there is ambiguity as to the existence of coverage, doubt is to be resolved in favor of the insured and against the insurer.”
- “Where there is ambiguity as to the existence of coverage, doubt is to be resolved in favor of the insured and against the insurer.”
- “Where there is ambiguity as to the existence of coverage, doubt is to be resolved in favor of the insured and against the insurer.”
- “Where there is ambiguity as to the existence of coverage, doubt is to be resolved in favor of the insured and against the insurer.”
- “under New York law, courts should not resort to contra proferntem until after consideration of extrinsic evidence”
- “Where there is ambiguity as to the existence of coverage, doubt is to be resolved in favor of the insured and against the insurer.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Titone
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.