Hand v. Young

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no good cause when the plaintiff did not move for time to extend service until thirteen years after filing the complaint
• “The fact that plaintiff’s claims may be time-barred does not require us to exercise our discretion in favor of plaintiff.”
• “[a]n attorney’s inadvertence, neglect, mistake or misplaced reliance does not constitute good cause”
• “Generally, when courts consider granting an extension of time notwithstanding a lack of good cause, they are considering motions made by plaintiffs prior to the expiration of the [90]-day period.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).