Skip to main content
· 6/24/2008

Hancock v. Potter

Citations

  • 531 F.3d 474
  • 20 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1311
  • 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 13306
  • 91 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 43,243
  • 103 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1162
  • 2008 WL 2497472

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that an employer’s efforts to accommodate a plaintiff’s self‐reported, physical work restrictions could not be considered adverse
  • explaining that “general hostility” will not be considered an adverse employment action “unless it was severe and pervasive”
  • concluding actions taken by the employer to try to accommodate the employee’s work restrictions were not ad‐ verse
  • concluding actions taken by the employer to try to accommodate the employee’s work restrictions were not ad‐ verse
  • informing the plaintiff that \[the counseling letter] and any response will NOT be filed in your Official Personnel Folder\ (additional emphasis omitted)
  • informing the plaintiff that \[the counseling letter] and any response will NOT be filed in your Official Personnel Folder\ (additional emphasis omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Flaum, Manion, Tinder

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.