· 6/24/2008
Hancock v. Potter
Citations
- 531 F.3d 474
- 20 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1311
- 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 13306
- 91 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 43,243
- 103 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1162
- 2008 WL 2497472
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that an employer’s efforts to accommodate a plaintiff’s self‐reported, physical work restrictions could not be considered adverse
- explaining that “general hostility” will not be considered an adverse employment action “unless it was severe and pervasive”
- concluding actions taken by the employer to try to accommodate the employee’s work restrictions were not ad‐ verse
- concluding actions taken by the employer to try to accommodate the employee’s work restrictions were not ad‐ verse
- informing the plaintiff that \[the counseling letter] and any response will NOT be filed in your Official Personnel Folder\ (additional emphasis omitted)
- informing the plaintiff that \[the counseling letter] and any response will NOT be filed in your Official Personnel Folder\ (additional emphasis omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Flaum, Manion, Tinder
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.