Skip to main content
· 3/30/1990

Hancock v. Planned Development Corp.

Citations

  • 791 P.2d 183
  • 131 Utah Adv. Rep. 5
  • 1990 Utah LEXIS 24
  • 1990 WL 54031

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing the rule of law, but noting that it will not control when the intentions of the parties are otherwise
  • noting that \a specific description will control or limit a general description\
  • trial court has no discretion to grant new trial absent showing of at least one circumstance in rule 59
  • trial court has no discretion to grant new trial absent showing of at least one circumstance in rule 59
  • trial court does not have discretion to grant new trial absent one of the grounds specified in the rule
  • “The paramount rule of construction of deeds is to give effect to the intent of the parties as expressed in the deed as a whole.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hall, Howe, Stewart, Durham, Zimmerman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.