· 3/30/1990
Hancock v. Planned Development Corp.
Citations
- 791 P.2d 183
- 131 Utah Adv. Rep. 5
- 1990 Utah LEXIS 24
- 1990 WL 54031
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing the rule of law, but noting that it will not control when the intentions of the parties are otherwise
- noting that \a specific description will control or limit a general description\
- trial court has no discretion to grant new trial absent showing of at least one circumstance in rule 59
- trial court has no discretion to grant new trial absent showing of at least one circumstance in rule 59
- trial court does not have discretion to grant new trial absent one of the grounds specified in the rule
- “The paramount rule of construction of deeds is to give effect to the intent of the parties as expressed in the deed as a whole.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hall, Howe, Stewart, Durham, Zimmerman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.